While conservative women protect their children and defend them when they’ve done nothing wrong, liberal mothers are apparently different. Using her infant son as a political prop, one liberal mother has decided to protest Neil Gorsuch’s Supreme Court nomination by throwing her son to the wolves in a lie that only a liberal could tell.
It’s truly disturbing that we live during a time when human babies are denied their right to life under the guise of choice. However, what’s even more disgusting is that liberal women are using their young children, who have already been born, to protest political appointees, such as Neil Gorsuch, because their kids could need to kill their grandchildren.
The Campaign Director for the Center for American Progress Action Fund, Emily Sussman, says that she has the perfect reason Neil Gorsuch should not be confirmed as the newest Supreme Court Justice, filling the late Antonin Scalia’s seat. So, she brought her seven-month-old son on the stage with her at a protest against Gorsuch, using the baby as a prop to back up her reasoning to protest the confirmation of a Supreme Court Justice.
“This is his first rally. Yeah, give him his welcome,” Sussman said of her son. “But I don’t want you guys to think he’s been slacking in his seven and a half months of life. He phone banked. He knocked doors,” Sussman said.
Then, she went on to reveal that her real reason to protest Gorsuch is because her infant son may need an abortion and Gorsuch won’t protect his “right” to murder a baby in his uterus. Liberals actually believe this stuff. Science no longer matters unless it revolves around climate change, and then, theories are supported adamantly as facts
“Don’t think he’s been sitting around on his white male privilege. He gets to work. He gets to work. Yes!” Sussman said, while using her as a political prop. “I don’t know what kind of protections he’s going to need. I don’t know if he is going to need access to a safe and legal abortion. And this court with Gorsuch on it will not protect him. I don’t know if he’s going to need access to bathrooms,” she said. “This court will not protect him. I don’t know if he’s going to need IDEA protections in education. I don’t know if he’s going to be able to access the marriage – to be able to marry who he loves. This court with Gorsuch on it will not protect him. We need to stop it.”
She doesn’t know if her male child will need access to an abortion or not. These people share oxygen with others. Trees created the oxygen needed for this woman to spew this nonsense, and in all honestly, she owes the tree a favor for allowing this speech with its oxygen. Does Sussman honestly believe that her son may not have access to a bathroom? Sure, she probably means that she doesn’t yet know if her infant son will decide he wants to use the women’s restroom over the men’s, but if he does, Gorsuch is going to somehow be solely responsible for her son using a men’s restroom.
It’s amazing that there are people who actually think like this on earth. We have liberals praising statues for not moving and giving them human qualities while asking for the “right” to kill their own unborn child who, apparently, has less human qualities than a statue. Gorsuch is pro-life, but are liberals really this afraid that they will not be able to kill their own child if he’s approved? He has no effect on whether or not Sussman’s son will or will not be able to get an abortion. Nature has already made that decision.